Systems, Networking, and Cybersecurity
Ph.D. Qualifier Exam
Spring 2016
Examining Faculty
Dongyoon Lee (Chair)
Ali R. Butt
Changhee Jung
Registered Students
- Islam Harb
- Sarunya Pumma
- Xuewen Cui
- Tong Zhang
- Yilong Jin
- Uday Ananth
Early Withdrawal Policy
Once students have notified the Computer Science Department of their
intention to take the Systems and Networking Ph.D. Qualifier Exam, they
may withdrawal from taking the exam at any point prior to the public
release of the exam questions. Once the exam questions are released,
the exam is considered "in progress" and withdrawal is prohibited.
Students with questions about this policy should contact the exam chair
directly.
Academic Integrity
Discussions among students of the papers identified for the System's
Qualifier are reasonable up until the date the exam is released
publicly. Once the exam questions are released, we expect all such
discussions will cease as students are required to conduct their own
work entirely to answer the qualifier questions. This examination is
conducted under the University's
Graduate Honor System Code . Students are encouraged to draw from
other papers than those listed in the exam to the extent that this
strengthens their arguments. However, the answers submitted must
represent the sole and complete work of the student submitting the
answers. Material substantially derived from other works, whether
published in print or found on the web, must be explicitly and fully
cited. Note that your grade will be more strongly influenced by
arguments you make rather than arguments you quote or cite.
Exam Schedule
11/6/2015: this web page created.
12/8/2015: release of reading list
1/11/2016: release of written exam
1/25/2016 (11:59PM): student solutions to
written exam due
2/8/2016 (9:00AM-12:00PM): oral exam in KWII 2225
Reading List
- "Failure sketching: a technique for automated root cause diagnosis of in-production failures",
Baris Kasikci,
Benjamin Schubert,
Cristiano Pereira,
Gilles Pokam,
George Candea,
SOSP'15
- "Detecting Covert Timing Channels with Time-Deterministic Replay",
Ang Chen,
W. Brad Moore,
Hanjun Xiao,
Andreas Haeberlen,
Linh Thi Xuan Phan,
Micah Sherr,
Wenchao Zhou,
OSDI'14
- "Invyswell: A Hybrid Transactional Memory for Haswell’s Restricted Transactional Memory",
Irina Calciu,
Justin Gottschlich,
Tatiana Shpeisman,
Gilles Pokam,
Maurice Herlihy,
PACT'14
- "The scalable commutativity rule: designing scalable software for multicore processors Systems",
Austin T. Clements,
M. Frans Kaashoek,
Nickolai Zeldovich,
Robert T. Morris,
Eddie Kohler,
SOSP'13
- "Chaos: scale-out graph processing from secondary storage"",
Amitabha Roy,
Laurent Bindschaedler,
Jasmina Malicevic,
Willy Zwaenepoel,
SOSP'15
- "Improving Reliability with Dynamic Syndrome Allocation in Intelligent Software Defined Data Centers",
Ulya Bayram,
Eric W.D. Rozier,
Dwight Divine,
Pin Zhou,
DSN'15
- "Free Launch: Optimizing GPU Dynamic Kernel Launches through Thread Reuse",
Guoyang Chen,
Xipeng Shen,
MICRO'15
- "Exploring and Enforcing Security Guarantees via Program Dependence Graphs",
Andrew Johnson,
Lucas Waye,
Scott Moore,
Stephen Chong,
PLDI'15
- "Per-Input Control-Flow Integrity",
Ben Niu,
Gang Tan,
CCS'15
Written Questions
Each year, the Systems, Networking, and Cybersecurity faculty
publishes a reading list of papers by the end of the fall semester and
a list of integrative research questions to answer within a 10-14 day
period. The deadline for students to provide written answers to the
research questions is usually within first few weeks of the spring
semester. The goal of the written exam is to evaluate the
student’s ability to creatively integrate content from the
constituent systems research areas.
2016 Exam Questions
(released on: January 11, 2015)
Oral Exam
The written exam will be followed by an oral exam, where the student is
expected to defend his/her solutions. Unless specifically requested,
the student is not expected to make a formal presentation. In the oral
exams, faculty may ask questions about any paper in the reading list to
assess the student’s understanding of the subject. Oral exams
will be scheduled individually for each student.
Monday Feb. 8th @ 2225 KW2
- 9:00a-9:30a: Sarunya Pumma
- 9:30a-10:00a: Yilong Jin
- 10:00a-10:30a: Uday Ananth
- 10:30a-11:00a: Islam Harb
- 11:00a-11:30a: Xuewen Cui
- 11:30a-12:00p: Tong Zhang
Assessment
After the oral examination, the examining faculty will determine the
student's score for the examination process. The score is between 0
– 3 points, depending on the student's performance on both the
written and oral components. These points may be applied toward the
total score of 6 points necessary to qualify for the Ph.D. The
assessment criteria, as defined by GPC, are as follows:
- 3: Excellent performance, beyond that normally expected or
required for a PhD student.
- 2: Performance appropriate for PhD-level work. Prime factors for
assessment include being able to distinguish good work from poor work,
and explain why; being able to synthesize the body of work into an
assessment of the state-of-the-art on a problem (as indicated by the
collection of papers); being able to identify open problems and suggest
future work.
- 1: While the student adequately understands the content of the
work, the student is deficient in one or more of the factors listed for
assessment under score value of 2. A score of 1 is the minimum
necessary for an MS-level pass.
- 0: Student's performance is such that the committee considers the
student unable to do PhD-level work in Computer Science.
Past Exams
Spring 2015 exam
Spring 2014 exam
Spring
2013 exam
Spring 2012
exam
Spring 2011
exam
Spring 2010 exam
Spring 2009
exam
Spring 2008
exam
Spring
2007 exam
Spring
2006 exam